← AI at Invent / How we govern AI
Capgemini Invent, Global AI

The custodian of how we build AI products.

The AI Design Authority sets the standards, guards the quality, and clears the path for every AI product we build for clients. It applies one bar for good, consistently, from first prototype to production.

4 standards pillars 5 lifecycle review gates 16 Group Gen AI risks covered
The mandate

A single, defensible standard for AI product quality.

AI products fail in predictable ways: unmanaged model risk, architecture that cannot scale, interfaces users do not trust, delivery that cannot be maintained after handover. The Design Authority exists to make those failures rare.

We are the shortest route to a product that is safe, sound, usable, and ready to run, backed by the evidence that proves it, not a gatekeeper that slows teams down.

What we own. The standards, the review gates, the reference patterns, and the decision on whether an AI product is fit to ship. That runs both ways across Beacon, our AI portal: we review the internal Claude skills that enter the AI Library, and we clear the client-ready accelerators and products that list on the Asset Exchange.

One thing we will not do. We will not wave through a model into production on accuracy alone, nor onto an unapproved tool or a prohibited use case. A model that is accurate but unmonitored, unexplained, or unowned is a liability. We decline to sign off, every time.

Aligned to Group standards

We operationalise Capgemini's Group guidance rather than reinvent it. Every standard and gate traces to source.

Gen AI Group Guidelines Cyber AI Policy, ISO 42001 Gen AI Risk Reference Architecture Cyber Approval Process ASLM & Industrialization Blueprint Vibe Coding Guidance See Foundations
The standards

The four quality domains.

Every AI product we build is measured against the same four domains. Each pillar carries mandatory standards and recommended practice.

The process

The five gates from idea to operation.

A single left-to-right path, aligned to the Group Cyber Approval Process and the ASLM asset lifecycle. Each gate is a short review; you carry the evidence forward.

Explore the gates in detail
How it works

Standards you build to & gates to pass through.

The Authority operates through three connected mechanisms. Teams stay in control; the Authority provides the standard, the review, and the sign-off.

1. Standards

A living library of what good looks like across the four pillars, mandatory where risk demands it and recommended everywhere else. You build to these from day one.

Browse standards

2. Review gates

Five lightweight checkpoints across the product lifecycle, with clear entry and exit criteria proportionate to the risk class of your product.

See the gates

3. Engagement

Scheduled gate reviews and on-demand advisory, with a clear route and a published response time. We meet you where the work is, not the other way round.

Engage us
Proportionate by design

Scrutiny scales with risk.

Not every product needs the same weight of review. We classify every engagement so effort follows exposure.

Risk Class 3: Foundational

Internal or low-stakes

Self-certification against the standards, with a light-touch gate at design and pre-production.

Risk Class 2: Elevated

Client-facing, contained risk

Full gate reviews with the Authority, including mandatory Responsible AI assessment.

Risk Class 1: Critical

High-stakes or regulated

Named reviewer, all gates, independent Responsible AI and security sign-off before launch.

Bring us in before you start an AI build.

The cheapest fix is the one you make before you write the code. Engagement at discovery costs least and saves most.